Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Handley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1938No. 12483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

W. B. Handley (appellee), an attorney, sued Mrs. Blanche M. Alexander and son, Winfield Morten (appellants), on a compromise agreement. The controversy arose substantially as follows: on the death of E. W. Morten, in 1929 (father and grandfather, respectively, of appellants), leaving a will which being objectionable to appellants, appellee was employed to contest same, and thereafter, for several years (until August 1933), represented appellants in matters pertaining to the Morten Estate. In 'August,. 1933, appellee was discharged by appellants (the reason not appearing) and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. P. C. Tomson & Co. v. HeidenheimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Scott v. LottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Dallas Opera House Ass'n v. Dallas Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Dallas Opera House Ass'n v. Dallas Enterprises, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Penn v. HareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  2. Priem v. ShiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Alexander v. HandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tinnin v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. McCleary v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API