Legal Opinion

Tinnin v. Crook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1960No. 5387PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRASER, Justice.

The appellant, Lee R. Tinnin, brought suit against defendant-appellee. The nature of said suit is substantially as follows:

Plaintiff brought his suit asking to be relieved of a contract to purchase a home and to be further relieved of all the obligations entered into thereunder, and for any further relief to which he might be entitled.

Plaintiff entered into the original contract of sale by instrument entitled, “Earnest Money Receipt and Contract of Sale”, dated February 24, 1958. This document purported to convey a residence located at 4500 Frankfort Street, El Paso, Texas.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McCarty v. HumphreyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Alexander v. HandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Turner v. PughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. King v. CliettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Nixon v. First State Bank of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Chapa v. Benavides Mill & Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Dameris v. Homestead BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Robert v. E. C. Milstead Ranching, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API