Legal Opinion

Abeyta v. Hensley

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1979No. 4908PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant, Narcisco Abeyta, brought this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries which he sustained while working in the course of his employment as a tire repairman. The appellee, Robert Hensley, was the president and general manager of the tire repair firm where Abeyta was employed. It was Abeyta’s theory that he could proceed against Hensley as a negligent co-employee. Abeyta claimed that Hensley was negligent in two respects: First, because Hensley failed in his duty to furnish Abeyta with a safe place to work; and second, because Hensley employed a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Markle v. WilliamsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kruse v. SchieveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Case v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Mauch v. Stanley Structures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mills v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API