Podruch v. State, Department of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This lawsuit challenges the fee charged by the respondent Commissioner of Public Safety for parking privileges for the physically disabled under Minn.Stat. § 169.345, subd. 3 (2000). Appellant alleges that the fee is an unfair discriminatory practice under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), specifically Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 3 (2000). In two separate orders, the district court ruled that (a) the fee violated the MHRA but no injunction was necessary because the state had ceased to charge the fee; and (b) the state and the commissioner were not liable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Seeds v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Seeds v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005