Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 2004No. A03-1707Published

1DissentRandall, Judge

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the district court. I do not find this case ripe for summary judgment. I suggest there are contested substantial fact issues. I would remand for further proceedings and leave both parties to the option of moving for summary judgment at a later date, if appropriate.

Perhaps, as to a criminal defendant, which respondent is not, the strict liability of the “dog bite” statute might not apply to police dogs as a matter of law. But I just find it difficult to believe that police dogs can willy-nilly attack and bite innocent bystanders, like respondent, at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Podruch v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API