Legal Opinion
Flagler v. Derickson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1982No. 15988-SAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
Petitioner Cynthia Flagler brings this special action from a contempt finding against her by the respondent judge. We assumed jurisdiction under Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(1).
On March 11, 1982, petitioner was served with a criminal subpoena in a matter captioned State of Arizona, plaintiff, v. Richard Roe, defendant, CR-125211. The subpoena required petitioner to appear and give testimony before Judge David Derick-son.
During the hearing held on March 18, 1982, the state’s attorney cross-examined petitioner in the presence of her attorney. The questioning centered on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. CarvajalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Kuhn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- State v. DagenaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015