Legal Opinion

State v. Ott

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 18, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 89-250PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

Defendant/appellant Calvin Duane Ott (Ott) appeals from summary judgment in favor of the state in a civil racketeering action. The issues on appeal are whether the trial court erred in ordering Ott to respond to requests for admission, over Ott’s assertion of his privilege against self-incrimination under the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution; whether the court abused its discretion in denying Ott’s application for a stay pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings against him; whether the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Wohlstrom v. BuchananArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. MetLife Auto & Home v. CunninghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. STATE EX REL. ROMELY v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API