Matter of Johnson v. Smith
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The claimant J. M. Johnson was employed by H. M. Smith of Watkins Glen, who conducts a coal yard and sells agricultural implements, farm produce and fertilizer. His duties were multifarious and included, according to his expression, ,! -anything from clerical work down to a coal heaver.” His wages were twenty-five dollars a week and a commission on the sale of coal. While working at Watkins Glen, he was allowed an hour off at noon and he paid for his lunch. When out of town on business for his employer, he used his discretion relating to the time and place for eating, but all his expenses on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Clark v. . VoorheesNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Crippen v. Press Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Claim of Cunningham v. Hunterspoint Lumber & Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Carroll v. Verway Printing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Matter of Bollard v. EngelNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Scott Tobacco Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Shoemaker v. Snow Crop Marketers Division of Clinton Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.