Legal Opinion
Varano v. Hicks
Montana Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 2012No. DA 12-0031PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Micheál Hicks appeals the Nineteenth Judicial District Court’s order awarding damages in the amount of $616.33 plus costs to Anthony Varano. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 The dispute between Varano and Hicks arose following a snowmobiling trip in Lincoln County. Varano allowed Hicks to borrow his snowmobile. The parties dispute the events that occurred during their outing.
¶3 On March 29, 2011, Varano filed a complaint in Lincoln County Justice Court alleging that Hicks caused $2,681.58 in damage to his snowmobile. A bench trial was held on October 26, 2011. The Justice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olsen v. MilnerMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Hendricks v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Micone v. Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Eldredge v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by10 opinions
- McEwen v. MCR, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Boyne USA, Inc. v. Spanish Peaks Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Owen v. SkramovskyMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Willis v. FerttererMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Estate of CorriganMontana Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.