Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Yesawich Jr., J.

This action was commenced by plaintiff in an attempt to recover for property damage under the collision insurance provision of a comprehensive automobile insurance policy written by defendant and purchased by plaintiff in January *1461988. On his insurance application, plaintiff wrongly reported that neither he nor any driver in his household had any motor vehicle violations during the preceding five years. In March 1988, plaintiff substituted a 1988 Pontiac Grand Prix automobile, registered in plaintiff’s name but owned by Michael Mooney, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Holm v. C.M.P. Sheet Metal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Mahar v. US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  4. DiDonna v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Makawi v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API