Legal Opinion
Mahar v. US XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 24, 2010No. 1:06-cv-1297 (GLS*RFT)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs Cornelius and Maureen Mahar brought this action against U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., Xpress Global Systems, Inc., and Gloria Morgan for injuries and damages sustained in a tractor-trailer accident. (Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 5.) U.S. Xpress and Morgan filed a counterclaim against Cornelius Mahar, (Dkt. No. 8), and a third-party complaint against Polsinello Fuels and Polsinello Fuels, Inc., (3d-Party Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 24). Pending are: Polsinello’s motions for…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Dilworth v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Centrifugal Force, Inc. v. Softnet Communication, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- A.H. v. Precision Industrial Maintenance Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.