Legal Opinion

United States v. Palese

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 25, 1943No. 8187PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

On April 15, 1942 the grand jury for the District of Delaware, which was investigating alleged violations of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act of 1925, 2 U.S.C.A. § 250, in connection with a general election held in Delaware on November 5, 1940, called Paul Palese, as a witness. As a result of the testimony which he there gave under oath, Palese was indicted 1 for having committed perjury in violation of § 125 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 231.

At the trial upon the perjury charge the Government called three witnesses. The stenographer who took the notes of the grand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. United States v. ReginelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  5. Goins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. HissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Leo Elwert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Fotie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API