Legal Opinion

Leo Elwert v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1956No. 14846PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Elwert appeals from his conviction of tax evasion in the United States District. Court for the District of Oregon. He contends that the indictment failed to charge him with a crime, that there is a variance between the indictment and the evidence, that the evidence does not support the conviction and that the District Court erred in giving certain instructions to the jury and in denying others.

Section 145(b) of 26 U.S.C. [now 26 U.S.C. § 7201] provided so far as relevant:

“ * * * any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Bridges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. Abe BenderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Alexander E. MarabellesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Carmen Denise HerediaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Brooks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API