Hubard & Appleby, Inc. v. Thacker
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk. Decree for defendants. Complainant appeals. The material facts in this case are that one Portlock executed a certain deed of trust, conveying certain real estate to secure the payment of a debt of $3,000.00 of himself to appellant, evidenced by three notes of the grantor, payable to the order of the appellant, one note for $300.00, payable December 3, 1913, another for $300.00, payable December 3, 1914, and…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk. Decree for defendants. Complainant appeals. The material facts in this case are that one Portlock executed a certain deed of trust, conveying certain real estate to secure the payment of a debt of $3,000.00 of himself to appellant, evidenced by three notes of the grantor, payable to the order of the appellant, one note for $300.00, payable December 3, 1913, another for $300.00, payable December 3, 1914, and the remaining note for $2,400.00, payable December 3,1915; all of such notes bearing interest from date, payable…
1Opinion of the Court
Sims, J.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:
[1] This case is now before this court for the second time. The former appeal is reported as Thacker v. Hubard, 122 Va. 379, 94 S. E. 929. That appeal involved an action at law brought by Hubard and Appleby, Inc., against the same Thacker who is the appellee in the present appeal, based on *40the same facts which appear in the record now before us, perhaps somewhat more elaborate in detail in the present record. On the former appeal, it was held that the action at law, based upon such a, cause of action,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Gifford v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thompson v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Hofheimer v. BookerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Black v. KraussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Blanton v. KeneippSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Waddell v. Roanoke Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.