Legal Opinion
Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 9, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The voting trustees have demurred to the bill on the ground that it presents a misjoinder of causes and is multifarious.
Reference to the statement of facts preceding the opinion filed upon the motion to vacate and quash (19 Del. Ch. 368, 168 A. 196), will disclose the nature of the suit. It is not deemed necessary to repeat or to elaborate in detail what is there stated. For the purpose of emphasis it is well, however, to point out that feature of the bill which has provoked the pending demurrer.
The bill has two aspects. The first aspect has to do with the validity of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Fleer v. Frank H. Fleer Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- Harden v. Eastern States Public Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Brown v. TilleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
- Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- Swacker v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Homewood v. Standard Power & Light Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Hastings v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943