Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Canada Dry Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 23, 1966No. 123PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Canada Dry asserts the court erred (1) in overruling, by the order of January 28, 1966, its motion to strike the amended complaint and dismiss the action, and (2) in striking, by the order of July 18, 1966, its alleged second further answer and defense.
Canada Dry contends Nationwide made no motion for leave to amend within thirty days after Judge Martin’s order of August 10, 1965, as provided in G.S. 1-131. The amended complaint was filed August 31, 1965. The exceptions to Judge Martin’s order of January 28, 1966, do not challenge the recital to the effect leave to amend had been granted. All…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Mercer v. HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Phillips v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Home Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Fasso v. DoerrNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Leader National Insurance v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.