Legal Opinion

Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1955No. 36,188, 36,189Published

1Opinion of the Court

244 Minn. 401 (1955)

MAE EVELYN RANDALL AND ANOTHER

v.

GOODRICH-GAMBLE COMPANY.[1]

Nos. 36,188, 36,189.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 29, 1955.

Clifford W. Gardner, Robert P. Liesch, and Charles Alan Wright, for appellants.

Meagher, Geer, Markham & Anderson, O.C. Adamson II, and D.W. Nord, for respondent.

DELL, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Action by Mae Evelyn Randall for injuries which she alleges resulted from the application to her ankle of "Hoff's Liniment," a compound manufactured and sold by defendant. Her husband, Ira Randall, instituted a companion action for damages resulting to him because of such…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Livingstone v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Froden v. RanzenbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. DuininckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Holz v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API