Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
244 Minn. 401 (1955)
MAE EVELYN RANDALL AND ANOTHER
v.
GOODRICH-GAMBLE COMPANY.[1]
Nos. 36,188, 36,189.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 29, 1955.
Clifford W. Gardner, Robert P. Liesch, and Charles Alan Wright, for appellants.
Meagher, Geer, Markham & Anderson, O.C. Adamson II, and D.W. Nord, for respondent.
DELL, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Action by Mae Evelyn Randall for injuries which she alleges resulted from the application to her ankle of "Hoff's Liniment," a compound manufactured and sold by defendant. Her husband, Ira Randall, instituted a companion action for damages resulting to him because of such…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Livingstone v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Froden v. RanzenbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. DuininckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Holz v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.