Legal Opinion

Smith v. Tucker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Pope county; the Hon. W. W. Duncan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vickers

The plaintiffs in error, Sarah A. Smith and Nannie Jeffers, filed their bill in chancery in the circuit court of Pope county alleging that they are the owners in fee simple, as tenants in common, of a tract of land described therein and containing 120 acres and are entitled to the possession thereof ; that defendants in error, William Tucker and Daniel Tucker, are in the possession of said land but have never had any interest in the same except an estate for the life of Sarah J. Keel, the mother of plaintiffs in error, in an undivided one-half thereof, which was acquired by mesne conveyances…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riggin v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Nicoll v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Rigor v. FryeIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harder v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wilson v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Haughn v. HaughnIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Thomas v. ChapinIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Whittington v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API