Legal Opinion

In Re Thornton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 2000No. 25199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an agreement pursuant to Rule 21, Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a definite suspension of six months and one day. We accept the agreement. 1

The facts in the agreement are as follows:

Respondent failed to promptly pay court-related expenses on two occasions. In the first incident, respondent failed to pay a $450 court reporter’s fee in a timely fashion. Although the court reporter telephoned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In re ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re ToneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. In re JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. In the Matter of W. Bradley Betterton-FikeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. In re ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API