Legal Opinion

In re Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 25, 2005No. 26017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to issuance of a letter of caution, an admonition, or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

*177 FACTS

On October 23, 2001, respondent was issued a letter of caution with a finding of minor misconduct by the Commission on Lawyer Conduct. That letter of caution arose from a finding respondent failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re GainesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re O'DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. In re BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Kenneth C. KrawcheckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API