Legal Opinion
United States v. Taylor
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 11, 1997No. 96-CR-20010-BCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE SEARCH OF HIS VEHICLE AND REJECTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
CLELAND, District Judge.
I. Background
The preliminary organization of this matter, including motions to suppress evidence, was referred under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Appendix C of the Local Court Rules, to United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) suggesting that defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence should be granted. The government filed timely objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HaarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. PageDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
- People v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.