Legal Opinion
State v. Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1971PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
Petitioner brings this special proceeding under .subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law to permanently enjoin and restrain the respondents from conducting and transacting their business in a “ persistently fraudulent and illegal manner ’ ’, and to direct restitution to all consumers *91of the amount charged for services not rendered, plus triple damages, pursuant to section 206 of the General Business L'aw.
The General Business Law does require every hotel to post ‘ ‘ a statement of the * * * charges by the day and for meals furnished and for lodging”. It further provides that “No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- State v. ITM, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. Bevis Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. Ludwig Baumann & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lefkowitz v. E. F. G. Baby Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Colson v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc. v. New York (In Re Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- State v. Solil Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.