Legal Opinion

Weinbaum v. Chick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2007No. 28036PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

David Weinbaum (“Appellant”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (the “Commission”) order adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), which had determined that Debbie Chick (“Claimant”) was eligible for unemployment benefits, because she quit her employment for good cause. Appellant argues that the Commission should not have affirmed the decision of the Tribunal, because the Tribunal erred in: (1) not hearing the testimony of one of Appellant’s witnesses; and (2) in finding that Claimant had “good cause” for quitting her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scrivener Oil Co. v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Brawley & Flowers, Inc. v. GunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. O'Connor v. Bonzai Express of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. HUBBELL MECHANICAL SUPPLY CO. v. LindleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri Pipeline Co. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Harter v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Tucker v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API