Crancer v. Lareau
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs below, defendants in error here, recovered a judgment after a jury trial against the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, for $5,050 on two alleged causes of action springing frqm a written contract between the plaintiffs and Charles D. Bell, made on September 14, 1920, whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell for $7,500 1,000 acres of timber trees out of 1,840 acres they owned, and Bell agreed to buy and pay $7,500 for them on or before August, 1921, and whereby they also agreed that Bell, or his assigns, “should have the exclusive option of purchasing the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Weaver v. BurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Orr v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Padbloc Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Atkinson v. SmothersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- (HC) Arevalo v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Biro v. Condé NastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Reger v. Bank of America CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021