Legal Opinion

Crancer v. Lareau

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1924No. 6496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs below, defendants in error here, recovered a judgment after a jury trial against the defendants, plaintiffs in error here, for $5,050 on two alleged causes of action springing frqm a written contract between the plaintiffs and Charles D. Bell, made on September 14, 1920, whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell for $7,500 1,000 acres of timber trees out of 1,840 acres they owned, and Bell agreed to buy and pay $7,500 for them on or before August, 1921, and whereby they also agreed that Bell, or his assigns, “should have the exclusive option of purchasing the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
  4. Weaver v. BurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Orr v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Padbloc Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Atkinson v. SmothersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. (HC) Arevalo v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Biro v. Condé NastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Reger v. Bank of America CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API