Legal Opinion
Biro v. Condé Nast
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 8, 2015No. 14-3815-cvPublished
1Opinion of the Court
14-3815-cv Biro v. Condé Nast 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2015 5 6 (Argued: October 2, 2015 Decided: December 8, 2015) 7 8 Docket No. 14‐3815‐cv 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 PETER PAUL BIRO, 13 14 Plaintiff‐Appellant, 15 16 v. 17 18 CONDÉ NAST, a division of Advance Magazine Publishers Inc., DAVID 19 GRANN, ADVANCE MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS INC., LOUISE BLOUIN 20 MEDIA INC., GLOBAL FINE ART REGISTRY LLC, THERESA FRANKS, 21 PADDY JOHNSON, YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 22 23 Defendants‐Appellees, 24 25 PATRICK BAHNERS, GEORGIA MUSEUM OF ART,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.