Legal Opinion
State v. Porelle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 28, 2003No. 2002-169PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Raymond Porelle, was convicted of two counts of stalking. See RSA 6S3:3-a, 1(d)(4), 1(d)(5)(A) (1996 & Supp. 1999) (amended 2000). He collaterally attacks the constitutionality of portions of the stalking statute. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. The defendant and the victim were in the midst of divorce proceedings in the spring of 1999. The victim had obtained a domestic violence restraining order against him. A visitation schedule was established which granted the defendant visitation with his two teenage sons on Saturdays from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. The pick-up and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State of Iowa v. Darrell Allen ShowensSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Bleiler v. Chief, Dover Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.