Legal Opinion

Shepherd Hardwood Products Co. v. Gorham Bros.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On March 30, 1920, defendant wrote plaintiff, offering to purchase certain “No. 1 surface clear veneer logs, * * * size to be 14 inch and up in diameter at the small end,” at the following prices per thousand feet: hard maple, $100; beech, $90, and grey elm, $100. The letter concluded:

“We agree to take any amount up to 200,000 of hard maple logs. You agree to furnish at least 75,000 feet hard maple logs, and any amount of the others you are in position to furnish. At least the minimum amount of hard maple to be delivered to us before June 1st.”

On receipt of this letter, plaintiff’s secretary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway v. Denver and Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cooper v. Lansing Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hickey v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. E. G. Dailey Co. v. Clark Can Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Floyd v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. StiglitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ensign Painting Co. v. Alfred A. Smith, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Ensign Painting Co. v. Alfred A. Smith, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API