Floyd v. Mann
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Assumpsit by John F. Floyd, doing business as the J. F. Floyd Lumber Co., against Robert K. Mann and Wil liam G. Watson, copartners as Mann, Watson & Co., for goods sold .and delivered. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit to recover the price ($152.98) of a car load of lumber purchased from him by the defendants. The defendants did not deny his claim for the car of lumber, but sought to set off against it a claim for damages, arising from a failure to deliver other lumber which the defendants claim to have been contracted for, by Robert K. Mann, one of their number. The learned circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendants, and judgment for $161.86 was rendered. The plaintiff has brought the case to this court by writ of error.
The questions argued are…
2Cited by9 opinions
- R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Krstovic v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Mutual Chemical Co. of America v. Marden, Orth & Hastings Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- W. F. Covington Mfg. Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Brown v. SpiegelMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.