Legal Opinion
Frances McDonald and Joy McDonald v. Nancy Petree and Holly Ann Hudspeth
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 13, 2005No. 04-5053PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Joy and Frances McDonald (“Mr. and Mrs. McDonald”) brought this diversity action, alleging that Defendants-Appellants Nancy Petree (“Petree”) and Holly Ann Hudspeth (“Hudspeth”) negligently caused Mrs. McDonald to be injured in a car accident. The district court below granted summary judgment in favor of Hudspeth. A jury later returned a verdict in favor of Petree, and the district court denied Mr. and Mrs. McDonald’s motion for new trial. The district court also granted both Petree’s and Hudspeth’s motions for costs. Mr.' and Mrs.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Emily Rivera v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Long v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Meeks v. SchofieldDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Naples v. Kinczel, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Express Packaging of Oh, Inc. v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.