Clark County v. Southern Nevada Health District
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPickering, J.
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. It commands— mandates—that an act be performed, exactly as ordered, no questions asked. Mandamus will not issue unless the act to be compelled is “ministerial,” Collier v. Legakes, 98 Nev. 307, 310, 646 P.2d 1219, 1221 (1982), that is to say, a matter of duty, *663NRS 34.160, not discretion. Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981).
In upholding mandamus in this case, the majority decides that Clark County must annually allocate 3.5 cents of every $100 of assessed valuation on all property in the county to the Southern…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Cromer v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Collier v. LegakesNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Nevada Attorney for Injured Workers v. Nevada Self-Insurers Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Young v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PERSHING CTY.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.