Legal Opinion

Cromer v. Wilson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2010No. 50767, 51365PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

Appellant Aaron Cromer received a jury verdict of $4,530,785.50 as a result of injuries he sustained in a car crash caused by respondent William Wilson. On appeal, Aaron and his wife Felicia Cromer raise several issues, only one of which merits detailed consideration. The Cromers contend that the district court should have granted summary judgment on the issue of liability because NRS 41.133 allows a judgment of conviction to conclusively establish civil liability for a crime and should have precluded Wilson from arguing comparative fault pursuant to NRS 41.141.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bisch v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Benchmark Insurance Co. v. SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Stubbs v. StricklandNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Williams v. United Parcel ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API