Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Page

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1969No. 11581PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bonner

The plaintiffs, Lawrence Lamb and Clara Lamb, brought this action for recovery. of damages for personal injury claimed by Clara Lamb and for property damage to the automobile of Lawrence Lamb. Defendants, Ralph Page, Mabel Page and Margaret M. Page, counterclaimed for damages to their automobile and after a jury trial the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $6,080. Defendants’ motions for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial were overruled by the district court and they now appeal.

This action arose out of two automobile…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Teesdale v. Anschutz Drilling CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Mally v. AsanovichMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pollard v. Oregon Short Line R.R. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. Alliance Real Estate GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. State v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Palmer Ex Rel. Diacon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Blasdel v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lyndes v. ScofieldMontana Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API