Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Oregon Short Line R.R. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1932No. 6,922PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe defendant, tbe Oregon Short Line Eailroad Company, a corporation, has appealed from a judgment against it and in favor of tbe plaintiff, William Pollard, in a personal injury action.

Tbe complaint originally contained two counts; tbe first based on primary negligence; tbe second grounded on the last clear chance doctrine. Tbe defendant interposed a general demurrer to each count, and, on tbe overruling thereof, answered, joining issue .as to tbe allegations of tbe complaint, and pleading contributory negligence as a special defense. Plaintiff replied, and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Batchoff v. CraneyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Burns v. FisherMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Gustafson v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API