Legal Opinion

Teesdale v. Anschutz Drilling Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1960No. 10136PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the district court of the tenth judicial district.

The action was brought by plaintiff for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by him in a fall from a water tank which was in the control of defendant at the time of the accident.

The facts of this case can be ascertained by an examination of the allegations and denials of the pleadings of plaintiff and defendant. Hancock Oil Company hired defendant, Anschutz Drilling Company, to drill an oil well for them. Hereinafter Hancock Oil Company will be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Chouteau County Farmers' Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. SouhradaMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pickett v. KygerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jones v. SATTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Blasdel v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API