Legal Opinion

Cabell v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1895No. 1814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case, the position of the parties upon the docket, however, being now reversed. 3 Texas Civ. App., 320.

The first error is assigned to the refusal of appellants’ third application for continuance, they having obtained two continuances prior to the first appeal. The absence of witness Hightower and of the leading counsel were the grounds of the application. The testimony of Hightower was shown to be material. Was the application in other respects such as to show a clear abuse of discretion in its refusal? It showed that the witness…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CrawlTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Johnson v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Highsmith v. UsseryTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolp v. SpechtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Wilkins v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Cunningham v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Wilkins v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API