Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1896No. 2021Published

1Opinion

Appellant on motion for rehearing complains of the decision rendered in this cause by a majority of the court (Chief Justice Tarlton not sitting), for the reason that we there held that a solvent as well as an insolvent person could make an assignment under arts. 65a, 65c, Revised Statutes of Texas.

The point was not briefed nor argued, and, with the concurrence of the other members of the court, I withdraw that part of said opinion — counsel for appellant having cited us to authorities which hold in effect the other way, and which I failed to find. Blum v. Welborne, 58 Tex. 157; Hudson v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CrawlTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Leon & H. Blum v. WelborneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hudson v. C. Eisenmayer, Sr. Milling & Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cabell v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API