Legal Opinion

Kolp v. Specht

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1895No. 2029PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

The appellees, H. Specht, S. B. Burnett, and Theo. Vogel, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment against the appellant, D. C. Kolp, as defendant, on a promissory note in the principal sum of $600. They also obtained a decree foreclosing the vendor’s lien retained in the note on blocks 7, 8 and 9 of the Texas Addition to Iowa Park, Texas. From this judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The note, as 'described in the petition, was dated April 23, 1890, due one year after date, and was payable to the order of W. H. Warner, trustee. It was transferred by the payee to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CrawlTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cabell v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Progressive Lumber Co. v. Marshall & East Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dancy v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Campbell v. PrietoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Lindsey v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Rader v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API