Legal Opinion

San Francisco Savings Union v. Long

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1898No. S. F. No. 1041Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco. Action by the San Francisco Savings Union against E. B. Long and others. From a judgment in favor of defendant Guy Shoup and another and from orders denying a new trial the other defendants appealed. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

The plaintiff is, and at all the times mentioned in the complaint was, a savings bank, duly incorporated, and doing business as such under the laws of this state. The defendant Home Benefit Life Association was organized as a corporation under the laws of this state in 1880, and from that time until on or about September 26, 1894, was continuously engaged doing a life insurance business upon the assessment plan.

In March, 1891, an act was passed by the legislature, entitled “An act relating to life, health, accident and annuity or endowment insurance on the assessment plan, and the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. DoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kruger v. Life & Annuity Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mills v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API