Legal Opinion

Mills v. Home Benefit Life Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1894No. 15201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the decision rendered upon the former appeal, 90 Cal. 402, and in the opinion of the court upon this appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The facts of this case are fully stated in Murray v. Home Benefit Life Assn., 90 Cal. 402; 25 Am. St. Rep. 133. Upon that appeal, by the decision of the court, the cause was remanded for a new trial. The respondent has since married, a new trial has been had, and the case is again before us upon the merits. In this action a recovery is sought upon a policy or certificate of insurance, issued by appellant upon the life of respondent’s husband. Prior to his death he suffered default in the payment of two certain assessments, and such default is now relied upon to defeat the right of recovery.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. GroveIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. San Francisco Savings Union v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API