Legal Opinion

Kruger v. Life & Annuity Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1895No. 15837PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiff was admitted to membership in the defendant corporation on the twenty-sixth *100day of February, 1886. A certificate of membership was then issued to her, by which it was stipulated and agreed that “if the said Mary Kruger shall fully comply with the laws and regulations of said association, and shall pay to said association the annual dues, at the rate of two dollars for each one ^thousand dollars benefit provided by this certificate, and shall pay within thirty days after notification each assessment made and levied by said association, in accordance with its by-laws,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perpoli v. Grand Lodge of Legion of W.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. San Francisco Savings Union v. E. B. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Maus v. Scavenger Protective Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Engwicht v. Pac. States Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. San Francisco Savings Union v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API