Legal Opinion

Malaer v. Hudgens

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1889PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Johnson county; the Hon. Oliver A. Harker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

Alexander Hudgens filed his bill in the Johnson circuit court, against the plaintiffs in error, Constantine Malaer and Mahala Springs, asking the partition of certain real estate. At the December term, 1878, of the court, plaintiffs in error were defaulted, and a decree pro confesso entered. • The court found that defendant in error was the owner in fee of an undivided eight-tenths of the lands, and that each of the plaintiffs in error was the owner in fee of an undivided one-tenth of said lands, and decreed partition, and appointed commissioners to make the same. The commissioners reported,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanford v. KaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cheney v. TeeseIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Moore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Becker v. FinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Mayor of Roodhouse v. BriggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Miller v. KensilIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Telford v. GarrelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API