Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Kane

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1889PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Second District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. Alfred Sample, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was a hill to redeem. Cassa Kane, the complainant, alleges that she is the owner of certain lands in Iroquois county; that on the 20th day of July, 1875, the title to said land was in Morris Kane, her husband; that on that day Morris Kane borrowed of Sanford $475, and gave his note therefor, signed also by the complainant, for $500, due three years after date, and bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, payable semi-annually, the $25 being a bonus paid by him for the money; that to secure the payment of said note, Morris Kane and the complainant executed to Sanford a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago & Great Western Railroad Land Co. v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Piper v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Frank v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hutchinson v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Parsons v. MillarIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Malaer v. HudgensIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Glos v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Holmstedt v. HolmstedtIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintockIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API