Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. O'Neil

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1964No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

In the early evening of November 29, 1959, on Route 19 some five miles northeast of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, there was a collision between motor vehicles traveling in opposite directions and operated, respectively, by Mary L. O’Neil and Howard E. Wolf. Kathleen T. O’Neil was a passenger in the car operated by her sister, Mary, and received serious injuries in the collision. Kathleen and her father, James M. O’Neil, instituted a trespass action against Mary which resulted in a verdict for Kathleen in the sum of |5,000.00, and a verdict for James in the sum of $2,-437.98.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Matkevich v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Nixon v. ChiarilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Campbell v. FiorotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Lindner v. FriedelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles v. LaRUESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Gregorich v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Wynkoop v. McLendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Gregorich v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API