Richmond v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Mark E. Richmond (appellant) appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine in violation of Code § 18.2-250. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence based upon an unlawful search of his car. Because the police lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion to seize appellant when they asked for and retained his driver’s license, the trial court erred in not suppressing the drug paraphernalia found thereafter.
I
FACTS
On April 8,1994, at approximately 9:51 p.m., Deputy Sheriff J.S. Sizemore of the Hanover County Sheriffs Department…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commonwealth v. GrimsteadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Fore v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Clarke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.