Legal Opinion
State v. Daniel
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2000No. E1997-00142-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 304 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a “seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution occurred when a police officer approached the defendant, Brian Daniel, in the parking lot of a convenience store, asked Daniel to produce some identification, and retained Daniel’s identification to run a computer check for outstanding warrants.
The trial court found that no seizure took place prior to the time the officer placed Daniel under arrest on an outstanding warrant which was…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by304 opinions
- State v. ThackerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher Lee DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.