Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided April 25, 2000No. 0425991PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
The appellant, Jamar Duane Clarke, contends: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence concerning three distinct incidents; and 2) the trial court erred in finding the evidence sufficient to convict Clarke of the charged offenses arising from the March 12, 1998 and April 30, 1998 incidents. We find that the trial court correctly denied Clarke’s motions to suppress, and we find the evidence sufficient to support his convictions. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
INCIDENT OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1997
Facts
On September 6, 1997,. at…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McCain v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- United States v. Everett Oshae BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Atkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Edmonds v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.