Legal Opinion

OCA v. Christie

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 16, 2006No. 3:04CV1517(PCD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. (“OCA”) and Orthodontic Centers of Connecticut, Inc. (“OCS”) bring this breach of contract action. Defendants move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment, arguing that the contracts at issue are illegal and thus void and unenforceable. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion [Doc. No. 27] is denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

Defendant Thomas Christie (“Dr.Christie”) practices dentistry in Fairfield, Connecticut through his professional corporation, Defendant Thomas E.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. R.B. Ventures, Ltd. v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. MullenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API