Martinez v. Mullen
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
MICHAEL P. SHEA, District Judge.
This case, which involves the State of Connecticut’s regulation of teeth-whitening services provided by non-dentists, illustrates the great deference courts must afford governmental regulation under the doctrine known as “rational basis scrutiny.” The governmental regulation at issue here is a rule that only a licensed dentist may shine a “light emitting diode” (“LED”) lamp at the mouth of a consumer *151who seeks to whiten her teeth. Although the State has not submitted any clearly admissible evidence to support this regulation, and although…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Westphal v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015