Legal Opinion

Apple v. State Insurance Fund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1975No. 47601PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

A trial judge denied petitioner’s claim for compensation, because barred by applicable statute of limitations, 85 O.S.1971 § 43, having been filed more than one year after last medical treatment, or last compensation had been paid. This order was affirmed by State Industrial Court en banc. Petitioner, hereafter claimant, seeks review’ and vacation of this order upon grounds the statute, supra, had been tolled or waived.

Claimant was injured November 8, 1971, and hospitalized by respondents’ physician [Dr. J. A. Me.] for medical management and conservative treatment. Claimant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Steffens Ice Cream Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Brown & Root, Inc. v. DunkelbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Washabaugh v. Bartlett Collins Glass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Tulsa Hotel v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Lekan v. P & L Fire Protection Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API