Burpee v. Pickard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
The will made no provision for the disposition of the residue of the estate after the death of the wife in the event that Forrest should predecease her leaving no issue. Since that contingency happened, the balance in the hands of the appellee, administrator, passes as intestate property. R. L., c. 360. White v. Weed, 87 N. H. 153; Heffenger v. Heffenger, 89 N. H. 530.
The first argument in support of the Probate decree is that the fifth and seventh clauses of the will disclose an intent to disinherit Forrest at least conditionally. “If testator does not dispose of the whole of his estate by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holmes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Simes v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- White v. WeedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Loveren v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Upton v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of StewartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Roulac v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In re Gibb EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Romprey v. BrothersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948